Kuhn on crisis and consensus formation in science
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61378/enun.v4i2.83Keywords:
crisis in science, consensus formation, social epistemology, Thomas KuhnAbstract
In our study, we examine Kuhn’s contributions to the rational explanation of consensus formation from a state of crisis in science.
References
D’AGOSTINO, F. Naturalizing epistemology. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.
ELSTER, J. Political psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
ELSTER, J. Explaining social behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
HOYNINGEN-HUENE, P. Reconstructing scientific revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1993.
KITCHER, P. The advancement of science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.
KUHN, T. The structure of scientific revolutions. 2a. ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1970.
KUHN, T. The essential tension. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1977.
KUHN, T. The road since Structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2000.
LAUDAN, L. Science and values. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.
PEIRCE, C. S. The fixation of belief. Popular Science Monthly, v. 12, p. 1–15, 1877.
PIROZELLI, P. A estrutura das controvérsias científicas: a sociologia da ciência de Thomas Kuhn. Tese (Doutorado) — USP, São Paulo: Departamento de Filosofia, 2018.
WILLIAMS, B. Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
I declare that the article or reviews or translation is original.
By publishing in this journal, I agree that:
a) my copyright will be maintained, granting the magazine the right of first publication.
b) I can assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g., publishing as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c) articles can be printed as long as the source of the journal is informed and the author (s) are duly credited.