Thou shalt care for the vulnerable image of man!
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.61378/enun.v6i1.122Mots-clés :
Hans Jonas, image of man, genetic engineering, cloning, vulnerabilityRésumé
In this article, I endeavour to present the philosophical reasons for Hans Jonas’dislike of certain tendencies of biotechnological development aiming at ameliorating the human being. According to Jonas, there are sound reasons why human beings should avoid playing God and refrain from using science and technology to ‘recreate’ their own being. Rather than simply discussing the issue from either a consequentialist or a deontological point of view, Jonas opts for a more resourceful and imaginative way to prevent the human being’s reification or deterioration, by focusing simultaneously on the human being’s vulnerability and higher potential.
Références
ANDERS, G. Die Antiquiertheit des Menschen, vol. I: Über die Seele im Zeitalter der zweiten industriellen Revolution, München: Beck, 1956; BECCHI, P. & FRANZINI TIBALDEO, R. “The Vulnerability of Life in the Philosophy of Hans Jonas”. In: Masferrer/García-Sánchez (eds.), Human Dignity of the Vulnerable in the Age of Rights, Cham, Springer, 2016, pp. 81-120;
BECCHI, P. & FRANZINI TIBALDEO, R. “Hans Jonas e il tramonto dell’uomo”. In: Annuario filosofico, 32, 2017, pp. 245-264.BECCHI, P. La vulnerabilità della vita. Contributi su Hans Jonas. Napoli: La Scuola di Pitagora, 2008;
BÖHLER, D. "In dubio contra projectum. Mensch und Natur im Spannungsfeld von Verstehen, Konstruieren, Verantworten", in: Id. (ed.), Ethik für die Zukunft. Im Diskurs mit Hans Jonas, München, Beck, 1994, pp. 244-276;
BOSTROM, N. “A History of Tranhumanist Thought”. In: Journal of Evolution and Technology, 14, 1, 2005, pp. 1-25;
COECKELBERGH, M. 2013. Human Being @ Risk. Enhancement, Technology, and the Evaluation of Vulnerability Transformations. Dordrecht: Springer, 2013;
DEWITTE, J. "Clonons un être humain", Alter, 22, 2014, pp. 211-232;
FERRÉ, F. “On Making Persons: Philosophy of Nature and Ethics”. In: Tirosh-Samuelson/Wiese (eds.), The Legacy of Hans Jonas. Judaism and the Phenomenon of Life, Leiden-Boston, Brill, 2008, pp. 493-501;
FRANZINI TIBALDEO, R. La rivoluzione ontologica. Uno studio sulle origini e il significato di “Organismo e libertà”. Milano-Udine: Mimesis, 2009;
FRANZINI TIBALDEO, R. ‘“Quaestio mihi factus sum. L’immagine dell’essere umano nella filosofia di Hans Jonas”. In: Annuario filosofico, 33, 2018, pp. 437-461;
GENSABELLA FURNARI, M. Vulnerabilità e cura. Bioetica ed esperienza del limite. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino, 2008;
GREISCH J. 1994. "L’amour du monde et le principe responsabilité". In: Vacquin (ed.), La responsabilité. La condition de notre humanité, Paris, Autrement, 1994, pp. 72-89 ;
HABERMAS, J. The Future of Human Nature. Cambridge, Polity Press, 2003;
HAUSKELLER, M. Better Humans? Understanding the Enhancement Project. Durham:Acumen, 2013;
HAUSKELLER, M. “The Ontological Ethics of Hans Jonas”. In: Meacham ed.), Medicine and Society, New Perspectives in Continental Philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer, 2015, pp. 39-55;
HAUSKELLER, M. Mythologies of Transhumanism. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016;
JASPERS, K. Die Atombombe und die Zukunft des Menschen. München: Piper, 1958;
JONAS, H. The Phenomenon of Life. Toward a Philosophical Biology. New York: Harper & Row, 1966;
JONAS, H. Philosophical Essays. From Ancient Creed to Technological Man. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall, 1974;JONAS, H. The Imperative of Responsibility. In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984;
JONAS, H. ‘Ärztliche Kunst und menschliche Verantwortung’. In: Id., Technik, Medizin und Ethik. Praxis des Prinzips Verantwortung.Frankfurt am Main: Insel, 1985, pp. 146-161;
JONAS, H. Das Prinzip Verantwortung. Versuch einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilisation (1979). In: Kritische Gesamtausgabe der Werke von Hans Jonas, vol. I/2. Freiburg, Rombach, 2015, pp. 1-420;
KASS, L. Toward a More Natural Science: Biology and Human Affairs. New York: Free Press, 1985;
KÖCHY, K. ‘Von der Naturphilosophie zur Naturethik. Zum Ansatz von Hans Jonas’, in: Hartung/Köchy/Schmidt/Hofmeister (eds.), Naturphilosophie als Grundlage der Naturethik. Zur Aktualität von Hans Jonas, Freiburg-München, Alber, 2013, pp. 27-54;
KURZWEIL, R. & GROSSMAN, T. Fantastic Voyage. Live Long Enough to Live Forever, Emmaus (PA): Rodale, 2004;
O’CONNELL, M. To be a Machine. Adventures among Cyborgs, Utopians, Hackers, and the Futurists Solving the Modest Problem of Death. London: Granta, 2017;
OLIVEIRA, J. & LOPES, W. E. S. (orgs.). Transumanismo: O que é. Quem vamos ser. Caxias do Sul, Educs, 2020;
PRUSAK, B. G. “Cloning and Corporeality”. In: Tirosh-Samuelson/Wiese (eds.), The Legacy of Hans Jonas. Judaism and the Phenomenon of Life, Leiden-Boston, Brill, 2008, pp. 315-344;
PULCINI, E. Care of the World. Fear, Responsibility and Justice in the Global Age (2009). Dordrecht: Springer, 2013;
RICOEUR, P. ‘La responsabilité et la fragilité de la vie. Ethique et philosophie de la biologie chez Hans Jonas’ (1991), in: Id., Lectures 2. La contrée des philosophes, Paris, Seuil, 1992, pp. 304-319 ;
RICOUER, P. ‘Le concept de responsabilité. Essai d’analyse sémantique’. In: Esprit (November 1994), pp. 28-48.
SAVULESCU J. & BOSTROM, N. (eds.). Human Enhancement. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009;
SGANZERLA, A. “Jonas: o homem como ser-na-natureza”. In: Sganzerla/Valverde/Falabretti (orgs.). Natureza humana em movimento, São Paulo, Paulus, 2012, pp. 322-341;SIMON, R. 1993. ‘Le fondement ontologique de la responsabilité et de l’éthique du futur’, in: Müller/Simon (eds.). Nature et descendance. Hans Jonas et le principe “Responsabilité”. Genève : Labor et Fides, 1993, pp. 101-107 ;
STELARC. ‘Prosthetics, Robotics and Remote Existence: Postevolutionary Strategies’, Leonardo, 24, 5, 1991, pp. 591-595 ;
WEISSKOPF, W. A. ‘Moral Responsibility for the Preservation of Humankind’ (1983), in: Gordon/Burckhart (eds.), Global Ethics and Moral Responsibility: Hans Jonas and his Critics, Farnham, Ashgate, 2014, pp. 23-40.
