Questões e problemas deixados por Kant para pensar a crise contemporânea da racionalidade humana: uma organização reflexiva de temas envolvendo a legitimidade da Razão
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61378/enun.v8i1.147Keywords:
Kant; categorias; razão; pragmatismoAbstract
Digressing through the first chapters on Kant's insufficient answer to skepticism without appealing to categories working as an inferentialist circular foundation, which manifests itself in the human practice of giving and demanding reasons (compatible with the recent pragmatist deontic scorekeeping model for successful assertions), we have prepared this article as a preamble to describe some open questions about human rationality and its crisis. In the latter chapter, we present the aporias related to the human self-image that is historically inserted in the context of mutual scorekeeping, our ability to represent solutions to problems of consensus and reforms for paradigms of social communication, as well as to become conscious of the categorical parameters that underlie the access to the truth (successful assertion). This article engages in a polemic with no pretension to answer it. It tries to compile the questions and aporias left by this reading tradition started by Kant.
References
BALDWIN, T. “The Inaugural Address: Kantian Modality.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 76:1-24. 2002.
CHIGNELL, A. “Kant, Modality, and the Most Real Being.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 91:157-192. 2009.
BEISER, Frederick. The Enlightment and Idealism, in: AMERIKS, Karl. German Idealism, Cambridge University Press: 2000.
FITCHE, Johann Gottlieb. Foundations of Transcendental Philosophy Wissenschaftslehre) Nova Method 0 1796/99), ed. and trans. Daniel Breazeale (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1992)
FREGE, G. Sense and Reference. The Philosophical Review, Vol. 57, No. 3 (May,1948), pp. 209-230. 1948.
GRAHOVAC, Vedran, The Tenacity of “Vicious Circularity” in Kant and Husserl: On Transcendental Deduction and Categorial Intuition, HORIZON / Fenomenologicheskie issledovanija/ STUDIEN ZUR PHÄNOMENOLOGIE / STUDIES IN PHENOMENOLOGY / ÉTUDES PHÉNOMÉNOLOGIQUES, 2018.
HAHN, L.E., ed. The Philosophy of P.F. Strawson, The Library of Living Philosophers, xxvi. Peru, Ill.: Open Court. 1998.
HABERMAS, Jurgen, 1971b. Knowledge and Human Interests. J. J. Shapiro (trans.). Boston: Beacon. [German, 1968b]
HAMILTON, Sir William, Discussions on Philosophy and Literature, Education and University Reform, second edition, London and Edinburgh, 1853.
HEIDEGGER, Martin. Being and Time. Blackwell Publishers LtdI 08 Cowley Road, Oxford. 2001.
HEGEL, George Wilhelm Friedrick. Phenomenology of Spirit, Cambridge University Press, 2018.
HENRICH, Dieter, Between Kant and Hegel: Lectures on German Idealism. Cambridge, London: Harvard University Press, 2003.
BRUNO, G. Anthony. Skepticism, Deduction, and Reason’s Maturation. In Skepticism: Historical and Contemporary Inquiries. Routledge. pp. 203-19. PhilArchive copy v1: https://philarchive.org/archive/BRUSDA-5v1. 2018.
HUME, David: 2001, An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding, edited by Tom L. Beauchamp, Clarendon Press, Oxford
KANT, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason, translated and edited by Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).
KANT, Immanuel. Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, translated and edited by Gary Hatfield, revised edition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004)
KANT, Immanuel. 1999.Correspondence. Translated and edited by Arnulf Zweig. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
O'SHEA, James. What to Take Away from Sellars’s Kantian Naturalism. In James R. O’Shea, ed., Sellars and His Legacy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. Oxford, UK: pp. 130–148. PhilArchive copy v1: https://philarchive.org/archive/OSHOJ-3v1. 2016.
REINIKAINEN, Jaakko (2021). Brandom and the Pragmatist Quest for Semantic Objectivity. Acta Philosophica Fennica 97:55-78.
STRAWSON, P. F. The Bounds of Sense: An Essay on Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Harper & Row, Barnes & Noble Import Division. 1966.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
I declare that the article or reviews or translation is original.
By publishing in this journal, I agree that:
a) my copyright will be maintained, granting the magazine the right of first publication.
b) I can assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g., publishing as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
c) articles can be printed as long as the source of the journal is informed and the author (s) are duly credited.
