Kuhn on crisis and consensus formation in science

Authors

  • Caetano Ernesto Plastino Departamento de Filosofia da USP

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61378/enun.v4i2.83

Keywords:

crisis in science, consensus formation, social epistemology, Thomas Kuhn

Abstract

In our study, we examine Kuhn’s contributions to the rational explanation of consensus formation from a state of crisis in science.


References

D’AGOSTINO, F. Naturalizing epistemology. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.

ELSTER, J. Political psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.

ELSTER, J. Explaining social behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

HOYNINGEN-HUENE, P. Reconstructing scientific revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1993.

KITCHER, P. The advancement of science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.

KUHN, T. The structure of scientific revolutions. 2a. ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1970.

KUHN, T. The essential tension. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1977.

KUHN, T. The road since Structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2000.

LAUDAN, L. Science and values. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.

PEIRCE, C. S. The fixation of belief. Popular Science Monthly, v. 12, p. 1–15, 1877.

PIROZELLI, P. A estrutura das controvérsias científicas: a sociologia da ciência de Thomas Kuhn. Tese (Doutorado) — USP, São Paulo: Departamento de Filosofia, 2018.

WILLIAMS, B. Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972.

Published

2020-04-01